Become a Votebeat sponsor

Pennsylvania Supreme Court to hear latest case over undated mail ballots

A decision could resolve constitutional challenges to rules in 2019 mail-voting law

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed to hear constitutional challenges to mail-voting rules that have led to thousands of ballots being rejected. (Kriston Jae Bethel for Votebeat)

Votebeat is a nonprofit news organization reporting on voting access and election administration across the U.S. Sign up for Votebeat Pennsylvania’s free newsletter here.

What happened? The Pennsylvania Supreme Court said Friday that it will take up a case, Baxter v. Philadelphia, on whether requiring voters to date mail ballot envelopes violates the state constitution.

What’s the dispute? Pennsylvania’s 2019 no-excuse mail voting law, Act 77, says mail voters must sign and date their ballot return envelope for their vote to be counted. Thousands of voters have had their ballots rejected in every election because the envelopes lacked a proper date. The validity of the dating requirement has been disputed for years, but the issue in the current case is whether it violates the “free and equal” election clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which bars any interference with “the free exercise of the right of suffrage.” Voting rights advocates argue that because election officials do not use the handwritten date to determine a ballot’s eligibility, it represents an unnecessary — and unconstitutional — burden that interferes with voting.

Who are the plaintiffs? The plaintiffs are Brian Baxter and Susan Kinniry, two Philadelphia voters whose mail ballots in September 2024 special elections were rejected for lacking a date. They’re represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania and the Public Interest Law Center. On the other side are Republican groups that have sought to defend the requirement. Other groups have also intervened on either side, including the Pennsylvania Department of State, the state Democratic Party, and state House and Senate Republicans.

What are they asking for? They initially asked a local court in Philadelphia to declare that the Philadelphia Board of Elections had violated their constitutional rights by deciding not to count the ballots. The court agreed, as did the Commonwealth Court, an appellate court. Republican groups challenged the decision to the state Supreme Court.

What happens now? The Supreme Court is taking up the case and has directed the plaintiffs to notify the state attorney general of the Republicans’ challenge. Republican Dave Sunday, who will be sworn in soon as attorney general, can choose whether to intervene in the case. The court may then order written or oral arguments on the case.

Read more of Votebeat’s recent coverage of challenges to the dating requirement:

Carter Walker is a reporter for Votebeat in partnership with Spotlight PA. Contact Carter at cwalker@votebeat.org.

The Latest

The new mandates, including a proof-of-citizenship requirement and revised voting machine standards, would override the powers of Congress, states, and independent agencies. Elon Musk’s team would investigate voter rolls.

Federal judge says the rule in SB1 discriminates against voters with disabilities, but lets it stay in place for the May 3 election.

With the SAVE Act back on the table and proposals in 19 states, voters around the country could soon be facing similar challenges.

A new bill responds to court rulings that have restricted the state’s authority to supersede decisions by local prosecutors.

Wisconsin’s Supreme Court election could change the makeup of the court and affect the outcome of rulings on election law and other key issues.

Legal battle over ballots for inactive voters pits Cochise County’s new supervisors against the secretary of state.